Ethical guidelines for our site Australian English Spanish German Hungarian Italian Polish UK English US English


    
in the news

understanding
your tests

inside the lab

about this site

site map

send us your
comments


home
How reliable is laboratory testing?

The role of testing: evaluating test results in a clinical context

The doctor is expected to evaluate all of the relevant findings – test reports plus information that he or she has obtained from you - before settling on a diagnosis and developing a treatment plan. Given the variability in testing and the potential for false results, no diagnosis should ever be made solely on the basis of a single laboratory test.

The clinician must always ask, "Do the test results fit with the other pieces of the puzzle?"

These other pieces include your clinical status (physical signs and symptoms) and your personal and family history. Pathology tests are not foolproof and can present an incomplete picture when not put into proper context. Careful evaluation and consideration of test findings increases the reliability of a diagnosis and reduces the chance of medical error.

If the results do not fit well with the clinical picture, some additional investigation may be required. A retest or alternative test may be requested when it is appropriate to confirm the findings.

What could make the test results invalid or inadequate?
Although laboratory testing must meet high standards for consistency and reliability, occasionally the test results are falsely negative or falsely positive since no test can be 100% sensitive and specific.


This page last modified on May 22, 2007.
 

In the newsUnderstanding your testsInside the Lab
About the siteSite mapSend us your commentsHome

If you don't know what a word or a medical term on this site means
use Stedman's online medical dictionary

We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.

©2007-2008 all rights reserved
Email concerns to labtestsonlineau@aacb.asn.au

Terms of use Privacy